Transcript

Ladies and Gentlemen!

Let me first express my gratitude to David Duke for having the opportunity to speak at this convention. My appearance here is anything but business as usual, and I am not referring here to the fact that I have been subjected to massive persecution in my country of origin, Germany, which still today makes it rather difficult for me to remain a free man. What I am referring to here are two factors which almost convinced me not to appear here.

History is Warped

[Editor's note: The Rebel Media Group distances itself strongly from accusation made by the author of this otherwise informative piece against Ernst Zuendel, Fredrick Toeben and other victims of the Kosher Inquisition. Accusations like this only do harm to the anti-Zionist movement by seeding disunity. -- Michael Savage] 

Our history books and encyclopedias tell us that Oswald killed Kennedy by himself, that lots of men walked on the moon, and that 19 Arabs attacked us on September 11.

After investigating such events, my conclusion is:

American schools do not "teach history" to their students. Rather, they "deceive" students with "government propaganda".

An American with a Ph.D. in history does not have an "advanced degree in history". Rather, he has "extensive exposure to propaganda".

Americans with PhDs in history are often given the title of Doctor. A more appropriate title would be Victim or Fool.

Learning to live among the sane and comfortably numb in the European Soviet Union of Zionist States

“No policeman would ever ask someone born in 1959 to stand in the dock before a judge and swear on the Bible that he had witnessed a crime that allegedly took place twenty years before he was born. Such a policemen would soon find himself charged with corruption and the witness would be incarcerated for perjury.” -- 'Mike James Sues German Jews for Incitement to Bear False Witness'.

“It remains the case that the German Reich survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial sovereignty. The BRD is not the legal successor of the German Reich.”  -- Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), 31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266 (277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363)

A Conversation with Prof. Egon Flaig

The following German interview with Prof. Egon Flaig appeared several weeks ago on the antinationalist website “Endstation Rechts.”  It is particularly interesting because it acknowledges that the BRD’s “Holocow” approach to “Holocaust” dogma has not only failed to squelch “Holocaust” Revisionism, it has been disastrous for German intellectual life and therefore self-defeating.  Who can blame the good professor for covering his posterior by rhetorically heaping praise on the draconian law (Paragraph 130 of the Criminal Code) that enforces the “Talmudic Inquisition” to which he objects?

On 30 April 2008 we met with Prof. Flaig in a Rostock wine cellar to discuss critical aspects of our present Erinnerungskultur (cult of remembrance) and the politics of history. Here we are releasing the first part of this discussion, and we are also posting commentary at the end of this aticle. With regards to commentary, we have to follow the guidelines limiting expression of opinion in Germany. 

Dear Professor Dershowitz:

I watched you speak (thanks to YouTube) on 04 May at the symposium titled “Defending Truth: Legal and Moral Imperatives of Holocaust Denial.” I understand that the event was organized by the U. of Baltimore School of Law and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies.

I agree with you that questions about the Holocaust should be open to the “marketplace of ideas.” Since February I have been asking academics to provide me with the name of “one person, with proof, who was killed in a gas chamber at Auschwitz.” The first professor to whom I addressed the question was Deborah Lipstadt of Emory U., the lady whose virtues you speak of with such enthusiasm during your talk. In the event, Professor Lipstadt did not respond.

On Sunday, May 4, 2008, Professor Alan Dershowitz spoke at the U. of Baltimore Law School, in Baltimore, MD. His subject was generally the matter of “Holocaust Denial.” During his wide ranging remarks, he made reference to, inter alia, Ernst Zundel; Bradley Smith; David Irving; Norman Finklestein; Patrick Buchanan; Noam Chomsky; Rabbi Michael Lerner; Robert Faurisson; the late Raul Hilberg: Israeli academics; Germans, who had lived through WWII; and the fate during WWII of the Jews of Rhodes, Greece. Professor Dershowitz also labeled ex-U.S. President Jimmy Carter “an idiot.” He submitted his views on the “uniqueness” of the Jewish Holocaust and on other related issues. Professor Dershowitz said that the law wasn’t the answer to combatting the Holocaust Deniers, but that instead the “marketplace of Ideas,” was the appropriate forum. He spoke at a Symposium, entitled: “Defending Truth: Legal and Moral Imperatives of Holocaust Denial.” The event was organized by the U. of Baltimore School of Law and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Center for Advance Holocaust Studies, and cosponsored by the Baltimore Jewish Council and the College of Liberal Arts, Towson University. There was a Q&A period after his opening comments. Professor Dershowitz was the keynote speaker at the affair.

Source: Google Video