|
 The Zio-controlled Amen corner aside, Israel's recent invasion of Lebanon has been accompanied by two main lines of argument: criticism of the genocidal nature of Israel's aggression, frequently equating it to the behaviour of Nazi Germany during World War II, and praise for the 'heroic effort' of Hezbollah. Unwillingly, these commentators are actually helping Israel with its psychological warfare.
Using Zionist stereotypes to describe Zionist evil makes us Zionist tools. By comparing Israel's atrocities to supposedly much worse war crimes committed by Nazi Germany, well-meaning critics are actually making those atrocities look much less evil than they actually are. In fact, they have the potential of creating an impression that Israel is actually restraining itself, that things could be much worse. According to the Washington Post, the CIA's media outlet of choice in its psy ops efforts, yesterday described Hezbollah as 'The Best Guerilla Force in the World'. And why is that so? According to the authors, and that's the real message of their article, because Hezbollah is financed and armed by Iran. Well, well, if Israel cannot beat Hezbollah, there is obviously an urgent need to attack Iran, isn't it? Convincing logic in the brave new world of terror. It has been long suspected that Hezbollah - like Hamas - is a creation of Mossad, designed to frighten ordinary Jewish folks into blind support for their criminal leadership, the Zionist mafia. Why else have those hundreds and thousands of rockets that Hezbollah made rain on Israel done so little damage? Why else are so many of the 'Israeli' victims ethnic Arabs? Why else did Israel halt its invasion after losing just a dozen of its troops? Since when do the Zios care about their population, or even their troops? If they did, they would have come to a fair and equitable peace with their Arab neighbours and natives a long time ago. As much as I can relate to anybody rejoicing over Israeli losses and the stalled invasion of Lebanon, I think we are kidding ourselves to believe that this is anything but a tactic, tricking US and UK voters into believing that Israel's existence is threatened by an extremely dangerous enemy, and it's all the Iranians' (and Syrians') fault. Israel's mock invasion of Lebanon was nothing but a smoke screen, in preparation for an allout war in the Middle-East and the fulfillment of the century old Zionist dream of a Greater Israel from the Euphrate to the Nile. Andrew Winkler is the editor/publisher of Sydney based dissident blogs The Rebel Media Group and ZioPedia. Andrew can be contacted under editor@therebel.org . You can find his articles A Thankyou to all Starbucks customers, The Last Taboo, For Evil to Prevail, Deadly Chess Game, The Bigger Picture, About Ziopedia and Reply to Jorge Hirsch's "Nuke Iran, Blame the Jews" on this site. Readers have left 3 comments. 3. Untitled
Adam, Registered Andrew Winkler's absurd and unwarranted hatred for Zionism blinds him to reality and leads him to write these highly biased articles insupportable by fact. He twists everything around to portray the Israelis as evil and dangerous, yet ignores the truth. Yes, Andrew, it is all the fault of Iran and Syria that there is unrest in the Middle East. Hezbollah is an Islamic terrorist organization funded by the two leading radical fascist governments in the region. If these two nations actually had any desire for peace, there would be peace. They would sever all ties with Hezhollah and cut off their support. They would renounce their hatred for Israel and, instead of blaming the Israelis for the plight of the Palestinians, would take some responsibility into their own hands and welcome the Palestinians into their nations as equals. These states, however, do not want peace, not as long as that peace involves the continued existence of Israel. Israel belongs to the Israelis; it is not Palestinian land and never will be. For some reason Iran and Syria cannot comprehend that Arab nations have hundreds of times more territory than Israel and that one tiny Jewish state has the right to exist among them. If the roles were reversed, and there was one minute Arab state surrounded by dozens of Jewish ones, I doubt that the inhabitants of that Arab state would take very kindly to any positions calling for its extinction. I am also well aware that Mr. Winkler will inevitably fail to respond to my statements, instead deflecting the argument to some unreasonable ground where he feels comfortable. I can't expect much more from such a man. 2. Untitled
Eugene Weixel, Registered It bothers Israel's supporters no end to see themselves compared with Nazis. While the Nazis had no monopoly on crimes against humanity they were not nice guys and in fact Zionism is one stripe of Nazism itself. They hate to hear this. I give Arab people more credit than you do. Yes they can fight, yes they can prersevere in warfare and yes they can win. 1. Untitled
Adam, Registered I didn't realize it's considered Nazism to defend your nation against despicable enemies who would like nothing more than to see your state in ruins, my mistake. |
Editorial 
